We figure out if there's a fit. If there isn't, I'll say so.
You don't need to be certain there's a fit before booking. But if any one of these resonates, the call is worth 30 minutes.
A recurring process — intake, triage, document review, reporting — that takes 5 or more hours a week and the people doing it are more expensive than the task warrants. You've thought "there has to be a better way" more than once.
One person at your firm who can test a new workflow week over week, give honest feedback, and champion it internally. Without this person, pilots fail — not because the AI is wrong but because no one is accountable for adoption.
Not "maybe someday." If the audit makes sense, you can move within 30 days. You're not shopping for ideas — you're looking for a specific next step. Tire-kickers and "gathering information" calls are a poor use of both our time.
There's no slide deck, no discovery questionnaire in advance, and no follow-up sales sequence. It's a direct conversation and it follows this structure.
Tell me about the workflow that's costing you — what it is, who touches it, how often it happens, and what breaks. The more specific, the better.
Based on what you've described, I'll tell you what an audit would map, which of the three bottleneck types applies, and what a pilot might look like.
Honest answer on both sides. If the audit makes sense, I'll say so. If it doesn't — wrong problem type, no internal owner, or the math won't pencil — I'll say that too.
If we agree to move forward, the audit statement of work arrives within 24 hours. One-page, fixed price, start date locked. No extended negotiation.
You don't need to prepare a presentation. But thinking through these before the call will make it 3x more useful.
WEEKDAYS · 9 AM – 5 PM ET · 30-MINUTE SLOTS
Currently scheduling 2–3 weeks out
Prefer email? Reach out at jason@nycolai.com